0

Remote Historian/Views/Architecture Options

I have multiple historians and a remote Axiom server. Is it better for Axiom to be pointed at a local Views instance which is connected to the remote historians, or for Axiom to use remote Views services on the remote historians?

Which option provides better performance in Axiom? Which has higher network bandwidth requirements?

3 replies

null
    • smason
    • 9 mths ago
    • Reported - view

    Hi ,

    We recommend having a local instance of Views with Axiom.

    Especially in your case, if you are wishing to see multiple historians within a single Axiom instance, you would need to set it up this way as Axiom can only be pointed to a single Views service at any one time.

      • amoldeep_phull
      • 5 days ago
      • Reported - view

       
      Hi Steve,
      I have a local instance of Views with Axiom that is connected to one remote historian.
      How am I able to add an additional remote historian to the Views on Axiom?
      How to Add a Remote Historian View (version 25) - Views and Asset Models - Canary Community
      This is what was used to set up the first remote historian

      • smason
      • 17 hrs ago
      • Reported - view

       ,

      You should be able to add it the same way you did the first one. I just tested this in my environment and I was able to add 2 remote historians along with my local historian all into one views service. I'm running v25.5.

Content aside

print this pagePrint this page
  • 17 hrs agoLast active
  • 3Replies
  • 130Views
  • 5 Following