Redundant Historian Architecture
What is the best solution for connecting a redundant pair of Ignition Gateways to two redundant Canary Historians? Should we just log historical data to both historians all the time or is there a better way to set this up?
5 replies
-
Kris, I believe this diagram matches what you are describing.
You would essentially duplicate your data logging configuration on each Ignition Gateway, exact same tag names logging to the exact same DataSets. When the primary gateway is unavailable, the second cold-standby gateway would begin logging the same tag names to the same DataSets as the primary.
-
If we are using a Warm standby system would it require a different architecture?
-
In this case, where the idea of having two Historians is to have a redundant system, where should the Identity service lie on? Should each Historian have its own identity service, or should it be a single one outside of the pair?