0

Best practice for modifying external properties saved in SQL

We recently set up external property storage using SQL as referenced here for a client. One question that we were asking ourselves was what should the client do if they want to modify or add a property as it may not be the best idea to give them full access to the sql database with the properties. From what i can gather the property saved in the sql has precedence over the one saved inside the historian plus i don't think its the best idea to have two of the same properties for a tag with different values so I don't think doing the usual property import is a good idea. The best i could come up with was to create something custom that modifies the sql table directly but I wanted to know if anyone else has thought about this before or if there is a simpler solution to creating something custom or even something built into Canary for this.

2 replies

null
    • Real-Time Manager at CSE ICON
    • damon_vinciguerra.1
    • yesterday
    • Reported - view

    When I was reading this I was coming to the same conclusion as you. Something custom. The “easiest” thing might be to have AI spin up a simple web app that would allow you to control who can modify what fields. 
     

    But, I agree with all your premises and assumptions. And I don’t know of any out of the box way to manage it. 

    • smason
    • 13 hrs ago
    • Reported - view

    I ran this by  , he suggested developing something in Axiom to be used as a data entry form and then scripting to insert/replace the properties in the sql database. A custom web app could work too but then it's another address for the user to know, and it's more custom code than just adding some scripting to an Axiom app.

Content aside

print this pagePrint this page
  • 13 hrs agoLast active
  • 2Replies
  • 12Views
  • 3 Following